As a professional, I have come across various legal terms that have different meanings in different contexts. One such term is the “opposite of mandate agreement,” which refers to a type of agreement that allows parties to act contrary to the instructions of the other party.

Mandate agreements are commonly used in business transactions, where one party (the principal) authorizes another party (the agent) to act on their behalf. The agent is bound to act in accordance with the principal`s instructions and can be held liable for any breaches of the agreement.

However, in some cases, parties may wish to act contrary to the instructions of the other party, and this is where the opposite of mandate agreement comes in. A contrary or reverse mandate agreement is a contract that allows parties to act against or in spite of the instructions of the other party.

For instance, in a real estate transaction, a buyer may instruct their agent to only show them properties within a certain price range. However, the agent may have knowledge of a property that exceeds the buyer`s budget, but that the agent believes would be a good investment for the buyer. In this case, a contrary mandate agreement may be used to allow the agent to show the property to the buyer, even though it goes against their original instructions.

Another example may be in the case of a business partnership, where one partner has the authority to make decisions on behalf of the partnership. However, the other partner may have concerns about a particular decision and may wish to veto it, even though they do not have the authority to do so. In this case, a reverse mandate agreement may be used to allow the vetoing partner to override the decision of the other partner.

It is important to note that contrary or reverse mandate agreements should be used with caution and only in situations where both parties fully understand the implications of such an agreement. These agreements can be complex and may require legal advice to ensure that they are properly drafted and do not expose either party to undue risk.

In summary, the opposite of mandate agreement is a legal contract that allows parties to act contrary to the instructions of the other party. These agreements should only be used in situations where both parties fully understand their implications, and legal advice may be necessary to ensure that they are properly drafted.